Net Coverage Solutions has withdrawn its application to install a 5G mast in St Augustine’s Church, Norwich, after objections were raised claiming the plans would “desecrate” the 17th-century brick tower. The Churches Conservation Trust was due to receive £5,000 a year for 20 years towards the upkeep of the church in return for the installation. However, concerns were raised about the impact on the Grade I-listed building, which is recorded in the National Heritage list for England. A petition against the plans was also set up by community leader Stuart MacLaren.
The installation company had requested several extensions to the decision deadline in order to provide specialist reports in response to planning queries regarding the site’s suitability. After withdrawing the application, Net Coverage Solutions expressed an interest in resubmitting the plans once the reports were complete. MacLaren, who initially opposed the plans due to the historical impact, said he was more receptive to the idea following a consultation meeting at the church in July. However, he welcomed the withdrawal, stating that the plans would interfere with history.
The decision to withdraw the application was largely influenced by the objections and concerns raised by local residents. One objector stated that it would be a travesty to desecrate the medieval building for the sake of technology, potentially causing harm to its sacred fabric. Another concern highlighted the historical impact of the mast on the Grade I-listed building, which is one of a few brick towers in Britain. The petition against the plans received support from 84 people, indicating the level of opposition in the local community.
The withdrawal of the application highlights the importance of preserving historical and heritage sites, even in the face of technological advancements. While the installation of a 5G mast would undoubtedly bring improved connectivity and technological benefits to the area, it should not come at the expense of desecrating or interfering with important historical buildings. The decision also underscores the power of local opposition and the significance of community engagement in shaping planning decisions. This case serves as a reminder to balance technological progress with the preservation of our cultural heritage.
