Thetford, Norwich and Kings Lynn among most common areas targeted by Norfolk Police dispersal orders

Dispersal Orders on the Rise in Norfolk as Police Tackle Urban Disorder
In the shadow of escalating community tensions and public disturbances across Norfolk, local police have significantly ramped up their use of dispersal powers over the past year. New data obtained through a Freedom of Information request reveals a striking 25 percent increase in the application of Section 34 notices—temporary bans that prevent people from gathering in specific locations for up to 48 hours. These legal measures have become an increasingly vital tool in the police arsenal, particularly in urban areas where community conflicts have intensified. The surge reflects both the changing nature of public order challenges in the county and the strategic shift in how authorities are responding to potential flashpoints before they escalate into more serious disturbances.
The geographic distribution of these dispersal orders tells a compelling story about Norfolk’s trouble spots. King’s Lynn leads with 434 notices issued, followed closely by Norwich with 410, and Thetford trailing with 104. However, the most dramatic change occurred in Norwich West, an area encompassing Bowthorpe, where officers issued 37 orders in 2025 alone—a remarkable increase considering only one such notice had been issued there in the previous five years. This spike directly correlates with ongoing tensions outside the Brook Hotel, which currently houses asylum seekers. The hotel has become a focal point for competing protest groups, with weekend demonstrations frequently spilling into nightly gatherings where smaller groups maintained a persistent presence until colder weather set in. These confrontations have not been merely symbolic—incidents have included harassment of staff and residents, with demonstrators shining laser pens and torches into people’s faces, damaging security fencing, and mocking security personnel while wearing Halloween masks. The situation has led to multiple arrests and prosecutions, placing significant strain on police resources.
The impact of these persistent confrontations extends beyond the immediate vicinity of the protests. Chief Constable Paul Sanford has described the protests as a “drain on resources,” acknowledging that the diversion of police attention to these flashpoints has compromised the force’s ability to address other crime in the community. The decision to implement Section 34 notices at the Brook Hotel beginning in November came after months of monitoring escalating tensions between demonstrators and counter-protesters. These measures represent a strategic attempt to prevent further escalation while balancing the rights of all community members, including both local residents and those temporarily housed at the hotel. The situation highlights the delicate balance police must strike between protecting freedom of expression and ensuring public safety—a challenge that has grown more complex in recent years as community tensions around immigration and asylum issues have intensified nationwide.
While the asylum seeker protests in Norwich West have contributed to the overall increase in dispersal orders, they represent just one dimension of the broader public order challenges facing Norfolk Police. The force reports that these powers are most commonly deployed to address large groups engaging in anti-social behavior, vehicle nuisance, and alcohol-related disorder. This explains why King’s Lynn North, home to the town’s concentration of bars and clubs, has seen the highest overall number of dispersal notices since 2020, with 376 orders issued. Norwich East, covering much of the city center including the nightlife hub of Prince of Wales Road and the area surrounding Carrow Road stadium, ranked second with 362 notices. These locations naturally draw large crowds, particularly during weekends and events, creating environments where tensions can quickly escalate if not proactively managed. Thetford rounds out the top three hotspots with 104 notices issued over the same period, suggesting similar patterns of concern in this smaller urban center.
The overall trajectory of dispersal order usage shows a remarkable 95 percent increase since 2020, rising from 142 to 278 annually. However, this stark figure requires context—Norfolk Police have noted that the comparatively low numbers in 2020 and 2021 were likely influenced by COVID-19 lockdowns, which naturally reduced public gatherings and associated disorder. As society has reopened and normal patterns of socializing resumed, so too have the challenges of managing public spaces where large groups congregate. This reality, combined with new focal points for community tension such as immigration protests, helps explain the significant uptick in dispersal order usage. The trend likely reflects both an actual increase in concerning behavior and a tactical shift by police toward earlier intervention before situations deteriorate into more serious public order incidents requiring resource-intensive responses.
Police representatives emphasize that these dispersal powers serve primarily as preventative rather than punitive measures. A Norfolk Police spokeswoman described Section 34 notices as “one of the operational tools that enables officers to respond swiftly to emerging public order concerns.” The authority to direct individuals to leave an area for up to 48 hours is exercised when officers have reasonable grounds to believe certain behaviors may escalate or threaten public safety. This approach aims to interrupt potential disorder before it develops, reducing the likelihood of more serious incidents while providing immediate reassurance to concerned community members. The increasing reliance on these powers reflects a policing philosophy that prioritizes early intervention and de-escalation—attempting to maintain public order with minimal force while balancing the rights and safety of all community members. As Norfolk continues to navigate complex social tensions alongside typical urban disorder challenges, these dispersal powers have become an increasingly central component of maintaining community safety and cohesion.




